undefined | Better HN

0 pointsredwood2y ago0 comments

How is it proprietary? It's using the SSPL which offers copyleft user freedoms

0 comments

3 comments · 1 top-level

gkbrk2y ago· 2 in thread

You can split software licenses roughly into two, open-source and proprietary. Since SSPL is not open-source, it's considered proprietary.

redwoodOP2y ago

What do you consider the AGPL and other copy left licenses? Even the OSI director acknowledges this one needs another look in the fulness of time here

gkbrk2y ago

I consider AGPL open-source. Same with other open-source copy-left licenses like GPL or LGPL.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse