undefined | Better HN

0 pointsjsunderland3232y ago0 comments

I’m curious if you’ve implemented a rich text editor with this. I think Google Docs uses canvas. I hate the browser APIs for rich text and wonder if this could be more a viable candidate than using contenteditable for future projects

0 comments

chearon2y ago

Google Docs uses canvas, yeah, and last I looked it used an empty contentEditable just to receive [rich text] input. I do think you could use this to write a document editor like Docs and side-step many of the problems with contentEditable, but I haven't tried to.

Every time someone releases a new rich text editor I'm disappointed to find that it uses contentEdtiable. Would be very interesting!

c-smile2y ago

> Every time someone releases a new rich text editor ... uses contentEdtiable

Sciter is using its own implementation (obviously).

contentEdtiable thing is indeed quite limited for general purpose WYSIWYG editor.

For example Web platform is missing transactional update [1] mechanism that allows to put custom DOM mutation groups into unified undo/redo stack.

Sciter's <htmlarea> element ( implement behavior:richtext - WYSIWYG ) allows to build specialized editors. For example it is used in Sciter.Notes [2].

[1] https://docs.sciter.com/docs/behaviors/behavior-richtext#ric... [2] https://notes.sciter.com/

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse