> Yes / Maybe later
We need to treat consent on the computer exactly the same way.
But people here seem to be unwilling to consider getting rid of their precious phones. So they will keep getting abused.
So yes, in 2024, my ability to interact with the society around me largely depends on my phone, which does indeed make it precious.
“oh what can you do”
“all phones are surveillance devices and everyone knows that”
good thing they let you have third-party app stores in the deal, otherwise people might get upset!
All phones are surveillance devices.
Hence, without any cookie, you will be treated like a first time visitor every time.
The only cookies websites need your permission to install, are third party tracking cookies. Consent is not required for the first party cookies necessary for technical operations of the site.
The "I don't care about cookies" extensions tend to consent automatically, so if you use those you should also make sure to manage your cookies somehow, with e.g. Cookie AutoDelete.
I can and I am already using all sorts of blockers at different level that even if I said yes at some point the data isn't going anywhere, but enough is enough, it shouldn't be an arms race to protect very basic privacy or simply having dignity in front of my computer or cellphone.
Do you want to hand over your data now, or later? Okay, maybe you'll "change your mind" and "consent" tomorrow when you're focused on something else... Aha! After 185 days of saying no, your finger slipped and accidentally pressed "Yes", we have informed consent!
With no they can’t do that.
I get a fucking SMS from Vodafone every day reminding me to complete some fucking survey. I even sent STOP back to the automated phone number they use, as it's specified if I don't wanna receive such messages anymore and I still receive them.
At least with Google you're using it for free. I'm f*ink paying for that Vodafone service and they still consider appropriate to spam me incessantly.
I could report the fuckers to https://anpc.ro/ but it's too much trouble on my side following up and they probably know it.
They wrote to the restaurant, the texts stopped, and I had a follow-up email from the data protection agency.
Ah ah ah!
They have recently updated their login page. Now instead of a single TAB to get from the user name field to the password field you need something like five key presses to get to the enter password page.
Yes, I should not use that surveillance company in the first place. Or in their opinion never log out, not use cookie auto delete, Firefox account containers etc.
Unfortunately I try to balance between the two standpoints.
1. The username and password fields have not been on the same page for like, 15 years. You havne't been able to get from one field to the other with just tab for ever.
2. If you mean the number of tabs needed to go from the username field to the "next" button, on the old login page it's still three tab presses
3. The obvious way to get from the username entry page to the password page is to just press enter while focus is on the username field. Doesn't that work with the new login page?
The new page just felt much heavier and slower, so I looked what I need to do to the stupid next button. For my UI I want: If it's not broken, don't touch it. Marketing and graphical designers go elsewhere. And there was nothing broken for me with the old UI. (Those with screen readers might have more substantial insights in one direction or the opposite, I don't know)
My bank fucked that up too, long ago... I even complained about it... I think software engineers fuck stuff up on purpose for job security and/or for the sake of staying busy. Yet I can't find a job because I dont have an IT degree
Ideally, you would just require an extremly complex password and no user ID though... Something like UUIDs
Anecdotal evidence from my kids and their various friendship groups is that they all flocked to Brave (especially on desktop) to avoid the ads on YouTube.
They all seemed individually very proud for doing so, beating the system as it were, which meant it very quickly caught on amongst all of them.
That is the danger for YouTube, as it's a key demographic..
Google photos are closed source. For all we know it could have analyzed all your photos locally and trickled the result to Google servers a thousand times by now.
Why this behavior is legal is beyond me. They do the same thing with Play Protect which I don't want to enable no matter how many times they ask.
Edit: apologies I assumed this was about android devices.
IP Address not good enough for them it seems
You can't.
I also have an android phone, and I never so far got persistent nag screens asking for my location. One screen on a new install, sure. Also lots of passive-agressive behaviour when you disable location. But no daily asks.
So I'd more chall this up to a bug or a third-party app abusing the permission system. I think more information would be needed when exactly the notification are happening, from which app they are coming and when they started.
But that may depend on where you live, European data privacy law might make things look a lot different here than elsewhere in the world.
One of the top idiotic designs by google for sure.
I would probably enable it if I believed their SMS app wouldn't become even slower and bugged than it is, still their decision to ask every time makes me not trust them with that decision