Not that you have to disclose, but I am taking an educated guess, as someone who has also worked for a (very) large law firm...

You reference a single civil case.

Where "two dozen" attorneys have each been retained as counsel, done work for your family on this one case, and every one of the two dozen of them have individually withdrawn their representation?

At some point (multiple points, really), something has to be very very wrong here:

Who are these attorneys who are all constantly withdrawing from your family's case, and why? That to me (and please, I am not attempting to judge) sounds like 1) their client (your family) failed to disclose fairly substantial material information to them, causing them to withdraw, or 2) their client has been notably/repeatedly uncooperative with their attempts to represent them, or 3) their client has (repeatedly) ignored statements about the futility of their case, and stubbornly pushed it forward, still.

And then we get to the court. A judge that doesn't raise an eyebrow at the second withdrawal of an attorney, let alone twenty plus is comatose at the bench. In my area, a capital city, judges want explanations from attorneys on their withdrawal, and the predicament doing so might leave their client in. They've even been ordered to brief public defenders (I know, criminal) before they could withdraw. Hell, even civil continuance orders for more than a month or so require justification as to why the continuance need be that long.