> Explaining why something happens doesn't go very far proving it doesn't?
Not sure what you're getting at. I'm asking for evidence of someone suing the NYPD in the manner this journalist might be harassed in the manner a cop collecting evidence on other cops was.
To me it works the other way round. You wouldn't want evidence it will happen, you would want evidence it wont happen. I think there will be no consequences if they go there?
