Skip to content
Better HN
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Search
⌘K
undefined | Better HN
0 points
woooooo
2y ago
0 comments
Share
That's leaning pretty hard on the technicality of who has the UN chair, with the detail that it's effectively us (NATO) vetoing their recognition.
Not that I'm cool with the cable cuts, but "rogue state" would be more fair imo.
0 comments
default
newest
oldest
pjc50
2y ago
I'm not entirely clear why state acts can't be called "terrorism"; examples would include the Libyan Lockerbie bombing, the French bombing of the Rainbow Warrior, and the Russian Salisbury poisoning incident.
woooooo
OP
2y ago
That's fair as long as we're consistent, personally I always prick my ears at "terrorism" after seeing it politicized for most of my adult life.
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse