Oh, there are many fun games from the 90's where you must infiltrate some place and every computer has some version of "due to the password rotation requirements, this week's password for the South-East door is 1-2-3-4, effective from Monday" pasted into it.

When the NIST added the bad rule into their ruleset (it was mostly a collection of bad rules at the time), it was already widely mocked in popular culture (well, within the target population).

I now wonder if that ruleset (the original one, that basically mandated you copy every flaw on Windows NT) was honest.

The rules of evidence govern what is admissible in court and I don’t recall any rule pertaining to NIST guidelines. I think what you might mean is that the guidelines are a learned treatise which, while it would be hearsay for me or you to quote as a fact witness, is nevertheless something an expert witness can refer to.

Perjury is lying under oath, not disagreeing with government guidelines.

Are there any examples of the former that you know of? Or is this just optimism?