You mean these highly anthropomorphised programs? It’s important that technical people don’t anthropomorphise them?
I agree but the creators of all the main LLMs have already crossed the line by a long way. E.g. It’s deeply troubling that it’s acceptable that LLMs deliver inline apologies.
it's kinda amusing because the LLMs evolved via selection of the best anthropic traits because the basic digested mountains of undiscerning information.
so the gullibility is merely one selected for trait convolution with state.
There is no evolution or trait selection involved in the training of LLMs. LLMs are statistical estimators of most likely next series of tokens. Those next series of tokens seem anthropic because most of the input was human generated text.
