undefined | Better HN

0 pointswhit5372y ago0 comments

Yes, MkDocs is an example of someone that's using a platform to good advantage. But the advantage they are using it for is to sell an excludable good: "new features are first exclusively released to sponsors."[1] Nothing wrong with that, but this constitutes "jumping through hoops" according to the view laid out in my post. Can we get to no hoops? That's the intriguing challenge!

[1] https://squidfunk.github.io/mkdocs-material/insiders/

> it will still suffer from the 'tragedy of the commons'.

Fortunately, we have lots of great research on how to avoid tragedies of the commons:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521405998

I aim to explain how this applies to Open Source in a future post, which I'm tracking here:

https://github.com/chadwhitacre/openpath/issues/14

0 comments

emorning32y ago

>> Can we get to no hoops? That's the intriguing challenge! <<

That's definitely a challenge :-)!

I'm unfamiliar with the concepts of institutional analysis but definitely interested in learning more.

I'm also interested in the Functional Source License.

I'm skeptical though! I live in a country where corporations will literally make people work for food if they can. It's very hard for me to imagine how an open source project gives away the thing of value that it produces and only afterwards gets the money it needs to survive.

Solving the open source sustainability problem would actually be world changing.

For now I'm following you on Twitter and look forward to future posts.

whit537OP2y ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse