Aside from Triton, there's a quite a bit of interest in Proxmox and XCP-ng in the community.
While alternatives are gaining popularity, they certainly do not have the same ecosystem that VMware users are accustomed to. Organizations are going to have to pony up, or make concessions.
There's also Nutanix, RedHat and other options that people have mentioned here.
It supports multiple hypervisors including VMWare, KVM, XCP-ng, etc. I haven't tried but it has some features to allow users to migrate from VMWare to Apache CloudStack with KVM and/or XCP-ng.
But the issue with this and Proxmox is vsphere is not just the web interface.
Usually a company has Veeam integration for backups, and server creation/decom automations all built on the vmware platforms...
The 1st party link has a much clearer title "VMware End of Availability of perpetual licensing and associated products" https://kb.vmware.com/s/article/96168?lang=en_US&ref=thestac...
E.g. it's not that NSX as a whole is discontinued it's that NSX perpetual licensing is discontinued and you must buy the NSX subscription licensing. Some of these other SKUs may not have an equivalent but for anything "big" like NSX or vSphere there will be.
The current article is about the KB article you linked that lists 53 products which it says are, as of today, no longer available under any license and have been entirely discontinued.
Again, not claiming that's what's really going on (maybe it's in error, or the products will be bundled with whatever SKUs they're still going to sell?), but it unambiguously says that these products are discontinued. It mentions the earlier end of non-subscription pricing and implies that this is in addition to that.
Edit: Looking further into this, it looks like going forward they will offer two main SKUs, VMware vCenter Foundation and VMware Cloud Foundation, which contain, or contain features from, many of the discontinued products. But none of the listed products will be available separately anymore. It's difficult to find more information than that, because the VMware website is still advertising all of the discontinued stuff as well as the old perpetual licenses that they discontinued a month ago.
It sounds like they are saying the products are entirely discontinued, including subscriptions, but then they say: "In the future, at the time of renewal, customers will be offered the best subscription products to fit their needs."
What does that even mean?
https://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2024/01/embracing-change-wi...
It's written horribly complicated, and it leaves a lot of open questions, but what it does not say is that you can't give money to broadcom to get the features of those products. And it's hard to imagine that this is the end of vsphere. It's just the end of buying vsphere.
The following products are at End of Availability (EOA). All licensing options
including ... subscription, as well as all editions, suites ... are included
in this announcement.
It sounds like those ones are going away rather than just forcibly transitioning people to a subscription model.But the OP says:
> Listing the 56 VMware products and platforms being killed off, VMware said: “All licensing options including Perpetual, Support & Subscription (SnS), SaaS/hosted and subscription, as well as all editions, suites and pricing metrics of each product, unless otherwise noted, are included in this announcement. These products are no longer available for purchase.”
I've heard Broadcom is also (dishonestly) pushing a sudden and harsh RTO plan that will probably lead to a huge amount of staff turnover.
Broadcom watched Arm sue Qualcomm, and was like, hold my beer. Revenue for VMware was 13.6B last year. They would have to maintain that for 4 more years just to break even on revenue. There is zero chance they will make a profit on this acquisition.
It reads like these products and any way to purchase them have been axed. What am I missing? - if the expectation is that these products will be bundled into future product offerings, that’s a big if and if I’m not mistaken I don’t think we have any concrete information about that yet.
https://news.vmware.com/company/vmware-by-broadcom-business-...
“All licensing options including Perpetual, Support & Subscription (SnS), SaaS/hosted and subscription, as well as all editions, suites and pricing metrics of each product, unless otherwise noted, are included in this announcement. These products are no longer available for purchase.”
Honestly, looking at the list, I'm not sure what they actually still sell.
It's likely that for whatever products remain after this purge, there will be no more major releases, only security patches and ever-more-expensive extended support contracts.
Maybe the bet here is that VMWare is so entrenched or the time horizon of the people making the decisions is so short that it won't matter to them personally. But I bet long term it has significant impact and makes room for competitors with more foresight.
Asking because in my testing of that in Proxmox 3 and 5 node clusters last month, the live migration would fail (aka just hang with no further progress) just over 20% of the time.
Haven't looked into it further (likely will though), but searching around online shows lots of other people having experienced the same issue. General sentiment seems to be "Proxmox is good for homelab and non-prod environments. But probably don't use it in production."
https://www.parallels.com/products/ras/remote-application-se...
Probably wishful thinking.
Make of it what you will...
Source: I work at VMware in presales
Your potential customers will not enter your sales funnel with this kind of strange and misshapen noise happening about your products.
https://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2024/01/embracing-change-wi...
For us, on-prem is about half the cost for compute and storage vs public cloud.
you might be cheaper with colocation instead of building your own datacenter but most enterprises still have a need for their own anyway.
Isn't it still common to find as a significant part of most on-premise deployments?
Given that it's broadcom it's safe to assume that this won't be a good thing for vSphere customers, but VMWare's vSphere product line was pretty batshit insane and consolidating it seems sensible.