undefined | Better HN

0 pointsbombcar2y ago0 comments

Notice the lack of "GPL" in that list, and I'm partially in agreement.

The GPL is amazing and wonderful, but the various "attachments" of the GPL are more weaponized (and to the detriment of users!) than the GPL ever was.

I'm glad the kernel stuck with GPLv2, and I wish other things had, too. A GPLv3 Linux Kernel would likely have helped a BSD tremendously, though but I think having everyone work on the same kernel without reservations has been an unmitigated good.

0 comments

singpolyma32y ago

GPLv3 isn't enough different from GPLv2 to matter in practice, usually. It's mostly clarifications like the cure provision.

jlokier2y ago

It's different enough that Apple thinks it's only safe for them to ship GPLv2 software on MacOS devices, not GPLv3.

This might have something to do with the way they sign shipped versions and use TPM security to verify what's run, even though you can manually disable some of this if you want.

So all GPL the software shipped on MacOS devices is stuck at the last version which used GPLv2, and they rewrote Samba which they had previously shipped, whose last GPLv2 version is too out of date to keep using.

mort962y ago

Wait are you only angry at the AGPL? Or what are you calling attachments to the GPL?

LGPL is a relaxation of the GPL, by the way.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse