The app should be able to run on iPhone 14 Pro, I believe the requirements is about 6-8Gb of RAM. And I was not able to run it on iPhone 13 Mini, because it has only 4Gb of RAM.
(Draw Things is by far the most advanced app that supports on-device Stable Diffusion on iOS devices and Apple Silicon Macs. It had a non-standard UI, but otherwise is really good.)
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/draw-things-ai-generation/id64...
Hell, i'd pay for something like this on Desktop (tho i'm on Linux (NixOS)).
Having used Drawing Things regularly for the last few weeks, I still get confused by certain interactions and UI elements, leading to mistakes, and 'lost productivity'. It would greatly benefit from a UX pass, as more standard UX improves expectations of what will happen upon performing an action.
Don't get me wrong: I appreciate that it was released –for free– and that its capabilities are what they are. I'm merely arguing that more cohesive UX and pro functionality are not mutually exclusive.
As an example of a 'pro' app, there's Pixelmator Pro, which is a very Mac-assed app. I was able to pick it and start using it immediately without tutorials as its typical UX is intuitive (to me, as a macOS user), even when it came to more complicated operations.
Some more examples that I can think of off the top of my head: Proxyman, TablePlus, Kaleidoscope, Tower. The only exception to my observation, based on tools in my daily arsenal: VSCode. Non-standard UX, yet still intuitive.
Everything else that's non-standard feels like I'm battling with the UI daily, even after years of use: Android Studio, Slack, and most of the complicated Electron apps.
I guess the app store redirected me to the desktop store?? Does not indicate an iphone 15 being required at all
So I updated to 17.2.
And only then does App Store let me know that it’s not compatible with this device anyway.
Thanks, Apple!
(I have an iPhone 14 Pro.)
My guess here is that the model is just trained on too many sexy pirates (it also has a propensity for producing asian women, which this model seems to do too). It does look like they support negative prompts but it requires you using "##" to separate positive and negative. Interesting design choice. You'll find these negative prompts helpful: disfigured, low quality, child, sexy, nude, extra limbs, ugly hands; and anything in the same vein. What works best is dependent on the base model and there is variance between different positive prompts. You may also have more success with something like automatic1111 which as long as you feel comfortable doing a git clone (which you're on HN, so I assume you are) then it'll be a better interface, but I don't know if there's a apple arm model or if baremetal has improved since last I checked.
