These hydrothermal systems can be structurally enormous and form gradients e.g. due to differences in rocks and temperature at different depths. This acts a bit like a distillation column. Every metal has different characteristic solubility and will precipitate out of solution in boundary areas where amount of metal in solution exceeds the solubility under those conditions. Since these are fluids, the solution is circulating, bringing fresh saturated solution to the boundary area.
In some regions like Nevada, there are places where very large and diverse gradients are exposed e.g. you will find copper, silver, gold, tin, mercury, lead, uranium, etc veins of various quality distributed across the same very local geological formation as different metals were deposited in different places within the same hydrothermal system.
A limitation on formation is that it typically requires a relatively large hydrothermal system with stable properties and appropriate chemistry over millions of years. The kinds of places that have large hydrothermal systems also tend to be geologically unstable.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annals_of_the_Former_World
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banded_iron_formation
Earthquakes make gold veins in an instant.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banded_iron_formation
Also plants performing agromining.
It's not a big blender, there are all kinds of processes forming gradients.
It is also because chemistry, periodic table stuff related to valence electron interaction. You actually don't find veins of iron, for example you find bands of iron oxide ore like hematite. The reason those are present is one-off because iron dissolved in water precipitated out when plants evolved to product oxygen gas via photosynthesis. Gold is just relatively nonreactive so it is found in relatively pure forms, like nuggets, that get eroded out of igneous formations.
The same goes for other materials: They are often interspersed with lots of other minerals or the ore form is actually several different compounds in random mixtures.
Another example is Aluminum which comes from Bauxite. We say Bauxite as if it was one single thing but its actually a varying mix of Al(OH)3, AlO(OH), FeO(OH), Fe2O3, Al2Si2O5(OH)4, TiO2, FeTiO3, FeOTiO2, and traces of others. The actual composition varies within and between veins.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S03043...
What mental model do you have that leads you to the wrong answer?
In general I think it is good to investigate both options: maybe I’m just wrong, or maybe I’m mostly right but am just missing a couple steps.
We’ve got lots of people commenting with processes that will sort the elements back out, so I think op was mostly right, just missing a lot of little processes.
Source?
We don’t know these elements’ half lives to an order of magnitude of orders of magnitude. How could we predict their concentration in our crust?
[0] Not a physicist. Not your physicist. Not FDA approved medical advice.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superheavy_element
However, the specific isotopes made in the r-process are very neutron rich, right up to the neutron drip line, and I don't believe we've made many of them.
Also, his wikipedia page has been edited into a hit piece against him, which makes the story even more interesting.
He predicted the discovery of Moscovium 115 before it was synthesized in an unstable form by Russian scientists. He claimed (and claims) that a stable form of element 115 is the "fuel" in antimatter reactors. It's an intriguing story. There's a Joe Rogan podcast interviewing him.
A pound of it would weigh a pound. ;0)
Do you mean how dense would it be? I don't know how well models predict density. But density is not proportional to atomic number or mass.
Osmium has an atomic number of 76 and a density of ~23 g/cm^3.
Uranium has an atomic number of 92 and a density of ~19 g/cm^3.