This perception of a dichotomy in news is a brain worm that needs to be excised from everyone's mind.
What's the "balanced" commentary for something like the JFK assassination, for example?
LHO was the lone gunman who shot the president because LHO was a communist. LHO was the lone gunman who shot the president because LHO was crazy. LHO was the lone gunman who shot the president because the CIA paid him to (and then killed him). LHO was a patsie and the president was shot by a second gunman from the grassy knoll because the CIA wanted to invade Cuba.
Off the top of my head those are the stories that would need "balanced commentary".
News organization don't need to be unbiased and they don't need to be balanced. What they need is a to stop catering to rabid political fanbases who've got involved in the team sport of politics not out of some sense of civic duty to their fellow man but out of loneliness and a need to belong[1]. News organizations are the mirror reflecting us, not the other way around.
[1] https://www.realclearpolicy.com/articles/2020/03/20/the_lone...