But where you are wrong is, moving forward in a world with a modern worldwide standard ISA (RISC-V) is actually writing a kernel in assembly (without abusing any preprocessing).
Please give us some actual evidence, instead of just saying "you're wrong", because the position you're taking seems extreme and, frankly, bonkers.
My opinion is this is wrong, and I did voice my disagrement and gave my own view on the matter. If there is something extreme here is the karma slash upon displeasing the pro rust people and AI bots on HN.
It's refusing to backup your position with anything more than saying "you're wrong" "you're wrong" "you're wrong". You've repeatedly been asked to explain why RISC_V would be better, why RISC_V changes anything, what you propose for how it would work (e.g. emulators), and you haven't. That's annoying, timewasting, and downvoteworthy.
Also, why does preprocessing matter so much?
Preprocessing does matter because it would be pointless to get rid of the compiler complexity to get instead preprocessing complexity.
For instance x86_64 assembler fasmg has the most powerful preprocessor out there.... because the assembler is actually written using this preprocessor language! So it is very easy to "slip" and to end up using excessively this prepropressor to actually write assembly code which is not an assembler!
