Just not in the fields where AI will replace them? Hardly a consolation that "people will always be creative" in e.g. interpretive dancing, if the music in our culture end ups being dominated by AI musak.

And I don't just care for my own music consumption, to be consoled that "some people will still be doing human music". I also care about the role of music in society in general.

I'd say the same for graphic design and illustration. Yeah, some people will be creative in those fields still. But I don't care for a world where 90% of the illustrations and graphic design we see are AI crap.

And I'm not saying it because AI does great illustrations, but because it does crap illustrations cheaper - which for the undiscerning manager will be "good enough", and for spam farms and the like will be a godsend.

>It likely will dramatically kill it and free up those people for other types of jobs as they can now be more productive.

>Humans will still continue to be creative and draw and paint. That won't change.

No, just the ability to make a living out of it, as opposed to getting a drab office or factory job will. That, and being confronted 24/7 by AI "art", would be the changes.

>No reason to hold society back just to hold on to some jobs

Who exactly did sign up for that, and who said this is "forward" and not following it's "holding back"?

Not every BS we invent is a possitive. Nor is "increased technology" == "better".