undefined | Better HN

0 pointsDaiPlusPlus2y ago0 comments

> It certainly isn't good for Adobe

It is good for Adobe: they'll be forced to make their products better.

...I hope!

0 comments

3 comments · 2 top-level

tonyedgecombe2y ago· 1 in thread

>It is good for Adobe: they'll be forced to make their products bette

Which they thought was harder than spending $20 billion acquiring a competitor.

xbar2y ago

Maybe it would be more accurate to say that they that there is no way for them to make a product that will steal Figma's market for less than $20 billion.

Adobe's despised reputation in business practices makes it hard for users to choose Adobe when any other creative option when it is available.

delecti2y ago

That would certainly be good for Adobe's users, but it means they'll have to put in a lot of work, which costs money that could otherwise buy so many yachts.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse