I can’t tell how close to the original these logos are without comparing them in AutoCAD. Perhaps there should be a source cited for each upload to improve this site.
By the way, for regular lines, SVG can be a good substitute but all CAD software and file formats treat splines differently. You need to store a bitmap copy to make sure something doesn’t get mangled up because of conversion. SVG surely does that. Native files will usually show all the construction lines involved in producing the details. That would be the proof that you’re the proper trademark holder.
What is the precision we’re using too? There should be some sort of standard there too. E.g. SVG16 to indicate precision.
My interest is in generative AI in the field of vector graphics. There’s a lot we can do there.
Don’t overthink this. If you needed a letter from a lawyer for every logo then Wikipedia wouldn’t have logos on every business page, and companies wouldnt often have press kits distributing high quality logos in various formats suitable for high quality replication.
Indeed, with all these logos in the code/repository, I wonder how long this will last.
SVG content (i.e. the text underlying the image) copyright to the person creating the SVG.
I would personally take this as a) a demonstration of how to implement various things in SVG and b) a demonstration of the skills of the SVGs’ creator(s). I can’t imagine any reason I would ever need to place Meta’s logo on anything.
Caveat: I’m in the USA. Could be different elsewhere in the world.
um... no. In the US, you can't take an image that I have a copyright to and turn it into an SVG and distribute it such that web browsers will render it into a facsimile of the image I own without infringing my copyright. It would be on you, not on the person viewing it.
At best you've created a derivative work that you can stop me from distributing and I'd have to make my own SVG. Of course, you wouldn't even have a license to send me a copy of your SVG, so I'd have to create my own anyway.
Also interesting, Tux is not the logo. From the same wikipedia page:
> Since Tux won none of the three competitions that were held Tux is formally known as the Linux brand character and not the logo.