Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
deegles
2y ago
0 comments
Save
Share
The paper just says "an estimated energy density of >1 kW/m^2"
0 comments
3 comments · 3 top-level
top
newest
oldest
pdonis
2y ago
"Energy density" is a misnomer, it should be
power
density, since the kW is a unit of power (rate of energy generation), not energy.
amelius
2y ago
That's quite an amount, about 3-5x the amount of energy generated by solar cells of the same surface area. It would mean the device would generate $2000-$4000 on a yearly basis.
Phenomenit
2y ago
Didn’t it say cubic meter, not square?
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse