undefined | Better HN

0 pointsmicrotherion2y ago0 comments

That stood out to me as well. Any insights why sqinn and zombie underperform in this case, and is the problem inherent to their design?

0 comments

2 comments · 1 top-level

cvilsmeier2y ago· 1 in thread

For sqinn it's because of its design: Shuffling that much data over process boundaries takes time. For zombie, more pprof would be needed to explain the behaviour.

ncruces2y ago

I would suspect some unnecessary copying. Nothing else explains a “lower level” binding (zombie) performing worse than modernc.

My (WASM) binding also has a lower level API. But I worked hard to make database/sql work first class, so I wouldn't expect much improvement.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse