So, again, it’s not just that anyone who disagrees and appreciates unlimited PTO is wrong, it’s that they’re actually bad people who only think they’re ok with it to kowtow to authority?
You’re using divisive, hyperbolic language to describe people who simply disagree with you or who have worked in places where unlimited felt, to them, like a better deal. Places you have not worked.
The entire point is that people use name-calling, specifically “bootlicker”, when they have nothing of value to say, and just want to punch anyone they disagree with in the metaphoric face.
I have worked places where five weeks was the minimum time you had to take off, with ability to take more, and places where you had limited PTO you were effectively prevented from using and which expired at the end of the year. That you have not had those experiences doesn’t make you the ultimate moral arbiter of truth.
In short, stop calling people names just because you think you have the only possible correct interpretation of something you clearly do not have universal experience in. It’s tacky and ugly.
