> backward compatibility won't be broken.
I'm not sure what your point is anymore. You are clearly divested. Your assessment is totally unfounded. What are you trying to accomplish here?
You can disagree with me and criticize my points, but I do not feel like it's done in a good faith or is leading to anything constructive.
So I'm going to stop the discussion here and let the readers judge by themselves what I meant, and what to conclude about it.