Before we started using coal as an energy source, wood was a popular source, but that was far from sustainable. See for example the graph in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forestry_in_the_United_Kingdom...
If we had to start from that point again, there still would be lots of coal, but mostly not in places that are as easily accessible as what was there in the 1800s. If you have to manually dig a few hundred meters down to even reach coal, and (likely) wouldn’t even know where to dig, would you even consider starting digging?
Oil and gas similarly would be problematic. There’s very little at or near the surface left.
So, likely, the jump would have to be from wood to wind, solar or nuclear.
That has been shown to be possible for wind (https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/2009/10/wind-powered-facto...), but it will have to be different from what happened in the Industrial Revolution.
You don't, though.
https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/coal/how-much-coal-is-le...
53% of the recoverable coal reserves in the United States can be recovered with surface mining.
Also, if civilization collapses it's still fairly likely that a powerdrill will survive (not necessarily functioning, but intact enough that people will look at it and play with copper spirals). Actually, so will internal combustion engines probably, although that won't do much without the requisite metallurgy.
We've mined out all the easy copper, too.
