Bard's probably just a middle man here.
The response: "I'm a text-based AI, and that is outside of my capabilities."
For me it returns a seemingly accurate answer [1], albeit missing his involvement with Twitter/X. But LLMs are intrinsically stochastic, so YMMV.
Personally, I struggle with anything even slightly technical from all of the current LLM's. You really have to know enough about the topic to detect BS when you see it... which is a significant problem for those using it as a learning tool.
I just ignore how confident ChatGPT sounds.
> OpenAI’s technologies had the lowest rate, around 3 percent. Systems from Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, hovered around 5 percent. The Claude 2 system offered by Anthropic, an OpenAI rival also based in San Francisco, topped 8 percent. A Google system, Palm chat, had the highest rate at 27 percent.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/06/technology/chatbots-hallu...
