It's synthesis of memory perhaps, but it's not memorizing specific answers; which is different yet from executing steps of an algorithm you have memorized.
> This isn't going to become true no matter how much you repeat it. You've consistently made assertions that are trivially proven false.
Then agree to disagree because I think you're full of shit. actually, not even that, I think you just don't even understand what I'm saying. which is agreeing with you 90% of the way. This article is nice. But Memorization -> Generalization -> Cleaning up Noise -> Stability is STILL NOT THE ALGORITHM. It will never be the algorithm. It's always just "generalization-ish". Which is again, a modality that human brains can use to process problems and works pretty well, and can presumably work very well, but is ultimately inferior to established, perfected algorithms.
but nah. you chose petty arrogance so yay, we get get to be dicks. fuck off.
No comments yet.
