> More and more people are okay with losing with privacy though, and
the more who take that position, the more you lose by not taking it.
I'm trying to simply that with an ear for contradiction;
If P; the more group A lose -> if NOT P; the more group NOT A lose. For
P -> L = some loss of privacy
(Okay it's late and I'm clutching at it a little, but something
doesn't ring true)
It seems like a formulation of "network effect" on the surface. But if
P => L it can't be the same L on the right hand side, no? For the
group who are the exclusion of A, their L has to be a gain. Or they
are not playing the game well/optimally,
