https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNO_cycle
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-process
Why does the world / kosmos (κόσμος) continue to exist? Is it necessary or contingent?
> In turn, most rain comes from water evaporated from surface water
This is true over the whole Earth, but if you look only on land (which is what matters in this case) roughly 80% of rainfall comes from plant transpiration, not evaporation from open bodies of water.I was shocked by the shallowness of a sequoia root system (though have never thought of any roots being as deep as their tree is tall!). It feels like the centre of mass would be too high for stability.
The trick is the width of the root system, especially plate roots, which can be over 40X the width of the trunk, and can interlock with neighbouring trees forming a stablising matrix.
There are almost fully underground trees which allows them to survive fire (they just lose the photosynthesising top) and also survive where grasslands have driven out forest cover. I know these trees exist in Africa, but don’t know if they live elsewhere.
I would think of these as “bushes” but really there’s no difference between a shrub and a tree except in the eye of the beholder.
A tree is a slow-motion explosion, one which can only occur at the boundary (interface) between air and earth.
A human is a slow-motion explosion, one which can only occur at the boundary (interface) between fluid and uterine wall.
We're not so different, because physics doesn't change. Both systems need resources from both sides in order to grow, so an interface is really the only option.
Hydrogen was created shortly after the Big Bang when the universe had expanded far enough to cool down that protons and electrons could come together to form hydrogens.
Hydrogens come together later to form the stars. Nuclear fusion inside the stars starts due to the pressure from gravity. Nuclear fusion of hydrogens turns them into heliums.
When the hydrogens at the core of the star are used up, the star collapses and then explodes, throwing the upper crust off.
At the core nuclear fusion of heliums starts, forming lithiums. Nuclear fusion of lithium then forms beryllium. The cycles of nuclear fusion of each element type continue to create the heavier and heavier elements. Carbons are created among the way. So is oxygen.
During each cycle the star explodes and throws off the elements from the upper crust.
After iron is created, nuclear fusion stops. Iron is super stable to resist nuclear fusion. Gravity continues to collapse the star until super nova happens.
Super nova is when all the other heavier elements created. Gold, silver, lead, platinum, uranium and others are created during this explosion.
The elements come together to form the planets and eventually become part of us. So we were created long ago inside a star.
Why? What property of 26 protons makes it super stable?
Nuclear fusion happens when two atoms come close enough that their strong nuclear force binds them together. Strong nuclear force only has effect in very short distance at the nuclear. Smaller atoms with their smaller size allow gravity of the star to push them together for fusion to happen. Bigger atoms with their more numerous electrons make it more difficult.
Bigger stars with stronger gravity can force fusions all the way to iron. Although iron resists fusion, a worse fate awaits it. With no more fusion, the star collapses further and becomes much hotter. The iron nuclei are broken down into alpha particles. The electrons and protons combine to form neutrons, releasing a flood of neutrinos, which cause supernova. Supernova has enough strength to cause fusions of all the heavier elements.
Does the 3% from burning fossil fuels seem too low? I thought that this would make up the majority of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere every year
Carl Sagan.
This seems to be a very big difference with non-organic things, including computers, which even though they are coming pretty close to thinking with LLMs now, keep the same atoms in the same configuration all the time.
https://naturalhistory.si.edu/sites/default/files/media/file...
> In any case: to me, the picture this paints is one in which we are not so much solid, isolated objects; and more like patterns surviving through time.
I'm especially interested in the proto-life molecules. How close do we get to e.g. proteins without having life?
I’d never appreciated before how much nitrogen was taken from the air to support agriculture. I wonder if this has a direct impact on climate change. Does reducing nitrogen in the air necessarily increase the proportion of the other gases including carbon dioxide?
for effectively everyone who has ever lived, and even most living adults, your body contains at least one atom that has been part of them, such as air they breathed or water they drank.
It's not rocket science.