undefined | Better HN

0 pointssnovv_crash2y ago0 comments

It's ok to give humans rights that we don't give to machines.

0 comments

3 comments · 1 top-level

corethree2y ago· 2 in thread

You're saying humans can break copyright but machines can't?

You realized machines didn't break copyright right? Machines can't do this yet so it's a non issue at this point.

Humans were sued in this lawsuit because humans are the ones who did this action.

The lawsuit is about this: I can copy stuff into my brain but not into my cybernetic assistive brain.

snovv_crashOP2y ago

Copyright holders aren't complaining about the training per se, they are complaining about the distribution and outputs of the models which in many cases directly regurgitate the training data.

corethree2y ago

In most cases it won't regurgitate the same training data. What happens is the model essentially models a full on continuous curve that best fits in-between the training data. The amount of points on that curve is 9999999x more then the training data and that 999999 is not an exaggeration. It's likely too small of a number.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse