Linux: mentioned 0 times (not counting Android)
With luck, maybe one of the ChromeOS might decide to use it, although given the capabilities of Web based software would probably be a waste in hardware capabilities.
Interesting that there's no hint of its relative single-thread performance. Wonder how the custom Oryon core stacks up against the ARM vanilla X4.
Otherwise, as a Linux user, I'd have to stick with x86.
High quality track pads, great high refresh screens, tiny adapters (or just use your mobile phone charger) and fantastic battery life.
First class Linux support would make a "must buy" device.
If they deliver on that, other than compatibility, it would be the best portable development environment available. Combine that with FEX and Proton, it might prove to be a competent gaming device.
So much potential here, I shouldn't get my hopes up...
Judging from previous ARM laptops, I can't see that happening. There is no way to make Windows be as nice to use as macOS.
> First class Linux support would make a "must buy" device.
That'd be my only hope, but I'm not holding my breath.
Unless it offers significantly better experience for the same amount of money, as much as I dislike the x86, it's hard to beat. Apple does it by offering exactly that.
A large on-board CPU cache -- solves that for smaller programs whose code and data can entirely fit into that cache.
But for larger programs whose code and data do not fit entirely into a CPU's cache -- the bottleneck is "how fast does it read/write from main memory?".
Here, for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite -- we are given a figure for that, of 136GB/sec.
Is it really that fast? Well, future benchmarking to confirm that number will have to take place. But if it really is that fast -- then that would be pretty respectable for a 2023 consumer CPU...
I hope it's true because it sounds pretty amazing. AMD may have to release an arm chip too or they will be pushed out of the consumer market