Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
JonChesterfield
2y ago
0 comments
Save
Share
Opinion is divided on this. My best guess is that ISO C was never a portable assembler, but the C programming language before standardisation broadly was, and that's how people hold both positions as self evidently true. Different definition of "C".
0 comments
1 comments · 1 top-level
top
newest
oldest
pif
2y ago
Programmers are supposed to trust official interfaces rather than undocumented implementation details ;-P
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse