Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
rfoo
2y ago
0 comments
Save
Share
Prefix scan is not embarrassingly parallel. Yet OP's statement still works when you change it to scanl (+) 0 [0 1 2 3]
0 comments
1 comments · 1 top-level
top
newest
oldest
mgaunard
2y ago
That requires + to be associative. And scan is one of the core skeletons of parallel skeletons, so obviously if you express everything as parallel skeletons, parallel programming remains manageable.
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse