That at least clarifies that the antecedent of "it" is WFH rather than RTO (which the grammar of your original comment implies).

But the comparison to communism is not along the axes one might expect, so it makes the relationship to your point a little hard to follow.

So, that link answers "Why do you think Paul Graham compares it to communism?"

Communism seems to be his favorite example of something that can work initially from a good starting point, but fails over time, and he also believes that's true of Work From Home.

He might "hate the leverage and mobility it gives employees", but his limited comparison of it to Communism isn't strong evidence in either direction.