For comparison; we don't print a whole lot on average but we are a four-person household with two kids in school.
As far as quality, I'm pretty satisfied; in my non-professional opinion it's just as good as any other ink jet printer I've used, and I've used a bunch. However, if you don't use the printer for a few weeks you'll have to run the print-head cleaning utility, sometimes two or three or four times in a row. I've always managed to unclog the print head after periods of non-use up to now.
I only print color photos and color artwork on the EcoTank. I also have a laser printer for text. If you don't need color, it's far more economical and less hassle to use a laser printer. For black & white text, I even prefer the look and feel of a printout from a laser printer over an ink jet. But if you really do need color, I would say that an Epson EcoTank is way more economical than traditional ink jets.
Giving up some speed, it can also print pretty quietly, which was nice when we had a big batch during night time.
But I still order family photos from an online store. YMMV.
Only used occasionally, all inkjet printers are nightmares.
Get an inkjet if you print all the time.
Don't get one if you don't.
Basically, inkjet is a good technology for color production work and poor for occasional use.
A commitment to printing is the key to inkjet happiness.
Good luck.
Also, it's very sensitive to an accurate horizontal positioning.
I replaced it with a black-and-white Xerox laser printer which costs more or less the same, but prints very fast, and has other functions like scanning from the feeder, copy, fax, etc. After 6 months still had no need to charge a printing head, which is only 2x-3x more expensive than HP InkJet ones.
Only nuisance is that the nozzles sometimes get a bit clogged up but that’s pretty easily fixed.
Even so I’ll never go back to a normal inkjet ever.
If you need to print high resolution images, it may not be your best bet though.