undefined | Better HN

0 pointsCyberDildonics2y ago0 comments

Why won't you deal with what you originally said? All of your comments are trying to avoid your original comment.

0 comments

2 comments · 1 top-level

MichaelZuo2y ago· 1 in thread

It seems your already starting to forget prior comments in this chain?

I explicitly stated 3 days ago:

> Well this seems a bit too snarky and not in good faith so I'm not going to substantially respond any further.

See this link: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37516711

Frankly, although I didn't want to bring it up previously lest it be too embarrassing, perhaps logging off and seeking some help would be the better choice, if you are genuinely forgetting how to check past HN comments.

EDIT: After thinking it over, I'm going to disengage here since I rather not risk the chance of inadvertently nudging someone further into a negative spiral.

CyberDildonicsOP2y ago

I'm not going to substantially respond any further.

You didn't substantially respond at all.

No one is victimizing you by asking you to focus on what you originally. You originally said that maybe statewide energy crisis that directly result in deaths are fine because it might make sense financially without even having any numbers or actual information of any kind.

All you did after was try to be insulting and act like you are being victimized while avoiding anything about what you originally said.

Why not just deal with the current topic? Why not explain what you said? It's bizarre that you would rather thrash around and try to blame people for replying when you could just deal with the thread directly.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse