That’s odd because the the brand of WFH that most people I’ve met want is identical to what they do in the office sans the commute. That being that they hop onto a zoom meeting with people who are in other physical locations or they are working independently and the office is just a distraction.

Another commenter mentioned that people were setting up a straw man against your words but I can’t agree. You keep implying that it’s rational for c levels to be working remote and then implying that regular employees only want wfh because they are just anti social.

Your comments are heavily biased with one viewpoint and I heartily disagree with it

I’ve been working from home for years. I leave the house and interact with real humans in person all the time. Sometimes I interact with real humans in person at home!

You go looking outside offices, it turns out there’re people everywhere. Who knew?

I think that proves a point that some jobs can be done outside of the office, so why not have people work where they prefer? For this CEO it's on the road. For a lot of people it's at home. For a lot of people it's both.

> Meanwhile, the brand of WFH HN folks want is to not leave the house and interact with real humans in person.

You've made this statement a few times in this thread, have you considered this is nothing more than a strawman?

I agree with you, people are twisting your words and setting up a strawman.