It's really incredible how plausible sounding ChatGPT's legal BS is. Completely hallucinated cases, arguments, citations (properly formatted for real reporters!), people, ideas... but if you just skim it, there wouldn't be any immediate way for a layman to tell it was total bullshit, and I'll bet an overworked attorney could be taken off guard, too. Obviously won't get you too far in actual litigation, and I really feel for the clients of any attorney that pulls such shit.