That energy is already present in the environment, as kinetic energy of wind, which will ultimately be reduced to entropic heat. A wind turbine doesn't affect that fact, though it may change the location at which the kinetic -> thermal energy transformation occurs.

The more likely impact would be of wind turbines removing sufficient energy from wind that thermal transport of the atmosphere itself is disrupted, though this would occur only within an immediate locale and at lower altitudes. Even very high turbines are only about 260 m (850 ft) tall.

The mechanism here would be a reduction in the distribution of solar heating within the immediate vicinity, similar to urban heat island effects.

And searching as I write this for "wind turbine heat island" I find precisely that mechanism described in this paper:

Wind plants can also impact local atmospheric conditions through their wakes, characterized by reduced wind speed and increased turbulence. We explore the extent to which the wind plants near an atmospheric measurement site in the central United States have affected their long-term measurements. Both direct observations and mesoscale numerical weather prediction simulations demonstrate how the wind plants induce a wind deficit aloft, especially in stable conditions, and a wind speed acceleration near the surface, which extend ~30 km downwind of the wind plant. Turbulence kinetic energy is significantly enhanced within the wind plant wake in stable conditions, with near-surface observations seeing an increase of more than 30% a few kilometers downwind of the plants.

"Wind plants can impact long-term local atmospheric conditions", Nicola Bodini, Julie K. Lundquist & Patrick Moriarty, Scientific Reports volume 11, Article number: 22939 (2021)

<https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-02089-2>

But that's not from energy transferred from the wind via the turbine, but of disruption of existing wind flows.