API Gateway
Should have been called: API Proxy
It's like: 3Scale
SNS
Should have been called: Amazon Messenger
It's like: UrbanAirship, Twilio
Kinesis
Should have been called: Amazon High-Throughput
It's like: Kafka
(It always gets me that someone actually named a large software product "Kafka".)
Same. Though, I forget what it is since I heard about it. Now I think it's funny that it could refer to either cruel bureaucracy or turning into a bug.
Honestly, it’s not just the icons but the names as well. A lot of them are completely unrelated to the product and make no sense
> Amazon EC2 Queue
Nothing to do with EC2 but okay.
More like Amazon Distributed Functions.
To be fair I can't remember half the product names other than the core ones either. Elastic Banana or whatever. Maybe Dynamo Donkey. I just don't know any more.
Edit: I'm also an AWS Architect Professional or whatever it's called now. Shows how a monkey can pass the certs eh?
Shockingly, one of those I got right was "select 4 out of 6".
Edit: nope, I have no idea. I forgot the number of options and type of questions varies quite a bit.
The names aren't often all that much better, of course
"AWS Simple Email Service." Were you worried I would forget it's an AWS service? Or worried that I wouldn't remember it's simple, or a service? Do you offer any other email service? Can I please just rename the label to "SES"?
First world cloud console problems, I guess.
Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon S3, Amazon Chime etc. vs AWS CloudFormation, AWS CodeCommit etc.
AWS WorkMail is a (different kind of) email services, and AWS Simple Notification Service has email delivery functionality. So, yes?
The pricing is designed to be cost-effective for all users, with a Free Tier of 100 icon identifications per month, a Pay-as-you-go plan at $0.01 per icon after the first 100, and a Premium Plan at $10/month for 1000 identifications, with extra identifications at $0.008 per icon. All plans include unlimited access to the Icon Library and API Integration, as well as High Availability and Fault Tolerance features at no additional cost. For more details, visit our Pricing page on the AWS website.
Start simplifying your AWS experience with the Elastic Icon Identifier today!
Is this really an Elastic service?
Illustrating abstract concepts that are similar to other, related abstract concepts is extremely difficult. Remember that it's got to be legible in a footprint of a couple dozen pixels on a side. When you're done, make sure it isn't close enough to any other AWS product symbols that customers would get confused. Also, run it by a committee of people who aren't designers, and are proud of that fact. If they are in a senior position, attempt to integrate their feedback, no matter how idiotic, into your design, because nobody's going to fight for a little thing like an icon symbol.
I stopped making logos, it's a really difficult and thankless job. Designing apps for complex use cases is way simpler.
The AWS icons seem procedurally generated based on a hash of each concept's name.
GCP shows you can have strong brand consistency (even a limited color palette) while still having decent illustrations [1].
[1] https://www.turbogeek.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/word-...
Just ask more money for it then :-)
So many of these are weird because I mostly know of their icons from the main console page which apparently doesn't match the ones this quiz is pulling from because it said the S3 icon isn't green and the IAM icon is a key. In the console it's green and an ID with a lock icon on it at least for me.
Wonder if OP could make a version of this that uses the console icons instead of the designer icons..
I was perplexed when it offered ELB as an answer when I've only known ELB to exist within EC2 and share its icon.
You can guess via the English if you are unfamiliar with the icon. And easy to spot via the color if you already know the icon.
Let's say if I forget the characters in the Illustrator icon. But I can recognize the icon is Illustrator because of its orange color.
I can imagine a few for things like sns, sqs, and lambda, but what's the right icon for kinesis?
______
| IAM |
-------
______
| EKS |
-------Someone should make a Chrome plug in for this...
AWS icons are next to Egyptian hieroglyphs in difficulty. Google iconography isn't so bad (but bad enough still.)
There was only one icon that I could guess from the context. The mobile analytics icon looked like a bar-chart and the other options were things like Kinesis and other services that didn't match the icon.
https://app.awsiconquiz.com/_next/image?url=%2Fimages%2Fques...
That said, AWS is transitioning away from those 3D logos. I just wish they'd transition away from Amazon vs AWS name prefix confusion. I've read the internal notes on why they do that, but the reasoning never clicked for me and I still have no idea without looking it up.
Is it as bad as the "Google" folder on an android?
Lots of icons are dots or squares that are connected, which of course isn't helpful because that's what nodes in a network actually are in all circumstances.
GCP is (un)fortunately saved by it's relatively low product offering (by AWS's standards at least).
... Horrifying
I got 3/20, because I've never used AWS professionally.
What do people actually think of this UI? These icons give a futuristic but also depressing look at the same time.
It really puts into context how meaningless these icons are. I log into AWS all the time and did terrible on this quiz (4/20), despite having seen some of these icons hundreds of times at least.
Obviously this is a joke to point out how useless the icons are, but I'd have thought working with them for so long I'd at least know a few of them.
I don't work with AWS a lot but I thought I could probably score a few points by following their rules for their color coding: orange for compute services, blue for DB related, green for other service management related and red for storage.
I got 6.
Why tf is Route 53 the same colour as compute services?
I use a variety of AWS services every day. I actually got a higher score than I was expecting.