No it isn't. It's more akin to denying phrenology, phlogiston, leeches or almost anything that psychology has claimed in the past 20 years. Bad science is everywhere and has always existed throughout history. You can't just pick some random bits of science that are agreed to be not bad and state that they're the same: they aren't.
> More than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree
According to the same people who literally put in writing that they would "redefine the peer reviewed literature if we have to" to stop disagreement getting published.
Please. Nobody who wants to know what's true gives a shit about what's said in the forums the academics under fire themselves control, that's obviously stupid.
“Looking at the list of signatories, there are a lot of engineers, medical doctors, and petroleum geologists and almost no actual climate scientists,” said Zeke Hausfather,
Are you aware you're citing a known climate change denier who agrees with the signatories that there's no climate emergency?
https://twitter.com/hausfath/status/1533875297220587520
It's a bit eye opening how many time I, a climate scientist, have been called a denier in the last 24 hours for having the temerity to say our children are not necessarily consigned to an apocalyptic hellscape of a future. Doomism is a disease, and a self-fulfilling prophesy.
which is in response to the lashing he got for this:
https://twitter.com/hausfath/status/1533480022559772673
“I unequivocally reject, scientifically and personally, the notion that children are somehow doomed to an unhappy life”.
Even Hausfather knows that, but other people say the same thing suddenly he's upset that they're just a bunch of Nobel Prize winning physicists, cofounders of Greenpeace, professors of atmospheric physics, climate researchers, meteorologists, experts on rainfall and flooding, earth scientists and ugh engineers.
