undefined | Better HN

0 pointsrvnx2y ago0 comments

Well look for yourself:

The rm answer is now "hardcoded" (aka, manually entered by reviewers), the same with the prime or fibonnaci.

This is why we both see the same code across different accounts (you can make the test if you are curious).

0 comments

ed2y ago

That's a hallucination. Here's a similar made-up answer:

LLM's aren't trained on their own documentation, and can't introspect, so generally can't answer questions like this.

(`"Mark House" "Bard"` gives no results on Google.)

Okay, so the entire point of the comment is "A current model which does well used to be bad!"

With all due respect, is that a valuable thing to say? Isn't it true of them all?

rvnxOP2y ago

Mhh not just about the past, you can see such in current answers from Bard.

They are generally okayish, closer to "meh", than something outstanding.

Yes the shell script solution is better, it doesn't give rm -f anymore, but is still somewhat closer to a bad solution instead of just giving rm -i.

I'm just really happy and excited to see that a free-to-download and free-to-use model can beat a commercially-hosted offering.

This is what has brought the most amazing projects (e.g. Stable Diffusion)

Isn't the model STILL doing bad if it needs to present a hard-coded answer?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse