undefined | Better HN

0 pointsSmith422y ago0 comments

I wanted it to reach a more general audience, as the review is very general in itself (but maybe the original title does not reflect this as I thought)! There are alternating sections concentrating on the astronomy and the deep learning sides.

0 comments

mdp20212y ago

That is very good and potentially precious,

but would it not have been better then

'A history_ of Neural Nets in Astronomy [and in general]'

Useful section of the title, informative important addendum for the public?

Otherwise you transform the original beyond its sense.

This is why we are asked not to editorialize in the guidelines.

TechnicalBassy2y ago

Though this is so deep/technical nature of a topic to target a general audience.

Smith42OP2y ago

Please give it a read! It begins from first principles (Rosenblatts perceptron!) and builds from there so you might find it more general than you expect.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse