undefined | Better HN

0 pointssimonblack2y ago0 comments

not be just the U.S. but the entire free world against them

The "entire free world" (aka 'The West') is not as big in population, and has nowhere near the manufacturing capacity as China alone.

There is a meme around which shows 'The world as the West sees it" which contains just one-eighth of the World's population. Called 'The Golden Billion' by some. The other seven-eighths of the World's population has bad memories of the shit they have received from the "entire free world" over the last several hundred years. And if you look closely, you'll find that they are the ones who refuse to join the West in sanctions on Russia, and are the ones queueing up to join the BRICS, SCO, and other 'non-Western' alliances.

We're coming to the end of a very long era: The Era where Western Nations were the Masters of the World. It's lasted several centuries, but the World is about to revert to the setup before about 1600 where the two powerhouses of the world are India and China as they had been for several thousand years before then.

We in the West are going to have to get used to that.

0 comments

anovikov2y ago

Well, we are the places where rich and smart people will always move to live. Because over here, their human rights and property rights are guaranteed and they can innovate. That alone more or less guarantees perpetual leadership.

Also, we have an advantage in diversity.

If people can move freely between places, the most attractive places are automatically the strongest long term. You want to tell me that at some potential future point, more people will try to immigrate to China than to the U.S.? That's not going to ever happen, period. If people can't move freely between places, the place rots and destroys itself very quickly as everyone is concerned with one thing: how to run away from it.

hollerith2y ago

>The West . . . has nowhere near the manufacturing capacity as China alone.

That's not true.

It is not even true of low-end manufacturing because on the low end, the critical input is energy, and the US has much lower energy costs than China because China must import most of its energy.

simonblackOP2y ago

It is not even true of low-end manufacturing because on the low end, the critical input is energy, and the US has much lower energy costs than China because China must import most of its energy.

Just keep believing that. Energy is but one input cost.

But a question: "If it's so much cheaper to produce stuff in America, why is the World's manufacturing done in China?"

hollerith2y ago

The answer to your question is that you are exaggerating the extent to which the world's manufacturing done in China.

simonblackOP2y ago

I have a challenge that I often hand out to people: Go for a mere 7 days without using or eating anything which is marked 'Made in China', and also without using anything that while it is not marked 'Made in China' contains Chinese components or ingredients. Off you go.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

anovikov2y ago

Also, we have an advantage in diversity.

hollerith2y ago

>The West . . . has nowhere near the manufacturing capacity as China alone.

That's not true.

It is not even true of low-end manufacturing because on the low end, the critical input is energy, and the US has much lower energy costs than China because China must import most of its energy.

simonblackOP2y ago

It is not even true of low-end manufacturing because on the low end, the critical input is energy, and the US has much lower energy costs than China because China must import most of its energy.

Just keep believing that. Energy is but one input cost.

But a question: "If it's so much cheaper to produce stuff in America, why is the World's manufacturing done in China?"

hollerith2y ago

The answer to your question is that you are exaggerating the extent to which the world's manufacturing done in China.

simonblackOP2y ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse