Please read this post written by meric, then give the counterarguments if you have them:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3665083
"I don't believe it is the stunt that costed github five to six figures. The loss of wealth was already there from day 1 when Github developers did not read Rails documentation and/or when Rails decided to make attributes publicly accessible by default. Today it is merely a "correction" where instead of Github's customer losing confidential company information without knowing it is now Github bearing the costs upfront, as it should be. In the "emperor has no clothes" story would you say it was the kid who pointed out the emperor had no clothes caused the emperor's embarrassment?"
You can also compare the whole context with the misfeature of PHP:
No comments yet.