undefined | Better HN

0 pointsmlyle2y ago0 comments

Maybe: lots of cameras around with evidence available to discovery, but held by relatively many parties (dashcams, private vehicles, business owners) and without automated aggregation and processing of personal information.

0 comments

2 comments · 1 top-level

osigurdson2y ago· 1 in thread

I think we need to change the rule that it is legal to take anyone’s picture without asking. We need less cameras, not more.

mlyleOP2y ago

Lots of cameras have been good at curbing lots of abuses.

Concentrated power with cameras-- one party controlling a lot of them, and doing automated aggregation of information-- has been bad for privacy.

Lots of cameras in public without the abuses of aggregating information seems best.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse