This isn't the proper subthread to have the grand gun debate and that isn't the point of my comment. But since I was replying to someone who is likely non-American, in the name of accuracy I need to point out what you are saying is directly false. Historically, this right has always been enumerated as individual firearms ownership, and is contextualized as such in the The Federalist Papers by the founding fathers who wrote the text of the Constitution, so there's really no argument to be had here. You can think it's a dumb idea, that it should be restricted or appealed, or any other such things, but to state that the Constitution does not enumerate an individual right of ownership is just patently legally and historically false. There are numerous SCOTUS decisions that also make this abundantly clear.