> That you probably don't need rights to the training set in the USEven if that is true--and it's not sure to be--Valve is within their rights to demand additional coverage.
> Humans can look at a collection of copyrighted images and draw a new picture. The legal basis for holding AIs to a higher standard is weak.
Horseshit and worse words. Computers aren't people. They create derivative works from pushing inputs through mathematical models. The inputs are unerasable and the claims to the otherwise by the AI hustler class exist only to be able to profit off human effort without paying for it.
