undefined | Better HN

0 pointsdureuill2y ago0 comments

Thanks for the elaboration. Now I'm wondering if this hasn't something to do with bottom-up people vs top-down people and their natural affinity towards lower level or higher level languages.

I'm very top-down, always starting by sketching the API I'd like to see for the feature, and then filling in the implementation. A lot of people I know from C++ are bottom-up, they toy with the implementation and then go up to the API. I found that what they like in systems programming is being close to the machine, while my interest lies in the OS boundaries and interfaces, not really the hardware.

I'm thinking maybe those different ways of approaching programming make it easier or harder to learn rust.

0 comments

steveklabnik2y ago

I think that's possibly insightful, yeah. A similar effect: a lot of people say "Rust is bad for exploratory programming because the compiler gets in your way." For me, it's fantastic for exploratory programming specifically because when I change something, it gives me a list of the other things I need to change! That's huge! But for others, it seems to harsh their buzz. I don't know how to reconcile these opinions other than "they're opinions and different people are different."

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsdureuill2y ago0 comments

Thanks for the elaboration. Now I'm wondering if this hasn't something to do with bottom-up people vs top-down people and their natural affinity towards lower level or higher level languages.

I'm thinking maybe those different ways of approaching programming make it easier or harder to learn rust.

0 comments

steveklabnik2y ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse