undefined | Better HN

0 pointsconstantcrying2y ago0 comments

Any particular theorem? This links to hard/impossible to access materials, but does any of them actually contain a theorem which proof is not accessible in some form?

Further is it any relevant theorem, which has been cited many times?

0 comments

rdlw2y ago

From the link I posted:

John Beck's Monadicity Theorem is cited in "many sources" but a manuscript has been found and "The proof is reproduced for instance in (MacLane, p. 147-150, Riehl 2017, 5/5/)".

Fred Linton cites Michael Barr for a "Universal property of the Kleisli construction" and no copy has been found.

I don't know enough about the subject to say how difficult these proofs would be to recreate or whether they exist elsewhere, but these definitely seem to be specific theorems.

I'd like to see a specific theorem in any field that was once proven and accepted but all existing proofs have been lost. That would be extremely tantalizing

constantcryingOP2y ago

I don't think this is convicing at all. None of this shows that there are generally accepted theorems without proofs.

The first one isn't lost at all, the second is just a single lost citation.

All of this is very far away from mathematicians building upon thr shaky grounds of mythical theorems. Also, in all my mathematical experience (going up to recent research in analysis) I never encountered something like this. In all textbooks I ever read either everything was proven or was cited to other works, which every time I checked included the proof.

cubefox2y ago

"Everything was proven" ... everything to satisfy a mathematician, not a logician. Formal proofs are generally very unwieldy, because informal proofs treat all the most obvious parts as obvious. In some cases these parts are not even trivial to prove formally. Last time I checked there was still no formal version of Cantor's diagonalization argument.

3 more replies

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse