undefined | Better HN

0 pointsfrankchn2y ago0 comments

There are reasons why drug approval can be slow and conservative: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thalidomide_scandal

0 comments

Yet the harm from that (10,000) was in many ways tiny compared to the harm from not deploying treatments that turn out to be good.

For example 780,000 people died of polio between 1988 and today. Yet for all that time there has been a cheap, low risk, well tested, near 100% effective vaccine (many in fact). And polio is probably one of the better cases because governments and charities have been pushing it pretty hard.

harimau7772y ago

The polio vaccine has been approved by the FDA during all of that time. Therefore, I don't understand how the deaths during that time provide evidence that the FDA should approve drugs faster.

Edit: Also, polio eradication efforts where a Manhattan project style heroic effort.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

londons_explore2y ago

Yet the harm from that (10,000) was in many ways tiny compared to the harm from not deploying treatments that turn out to be good.

harimau7772y ago

The polio vaccine has been approved by the FDA during all of that time. Therefore, I don't understand how the deaths during that time provide evidence that the FDA should approve drugs faster.

Edit: Also, polio eradication efforts where a Manhattan project style heroic effort.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse