undefined | Better HN

0 pointshef198982y ago0 comments

So, your line thinking goes:

It can have been an accident, or not. If not, well there were a lot of arsons happening at the same , maybe, so it most likely was arson. Not calling it arson is clearly political. And that means it was arson, because people in power and the establishment cannot be trustesd. It also means the arson was caused by politians, and those people in power not protecting us. Because they fail to do their job

You are aware that the moment the fire actually was an accident, the other 90% of your comment are pretty close to a conspiracy theory?

0 comments

pclmulqdq2y ago

Asking for an investigation that wasn't done isn't a conspiracy theory. Pointing out that the investigation should have been done, since arson in churches is very common, isn't a conspiracy theory.

hef19898OP2y ago

The fire was investigated, the fire protection system, an unorganized mess build over decades, was analyzed. I have no idea what people are talking about when they claim it was arson, it was not.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse